

|
The World Is Flat [Updated and Expanded]: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century (Audio CD)
by Thomas L. Friedman
Category:
Non-fiction, Globalization, Outsourcing, Business |
Market price: ¥ 598.00
MSL price:
¥ 558.00
[ Shop incentives ]
|
Stock:
Pre-order item, lead time 3-7 weeks upon payment [ COD term does not apply to pre-order items ] |
|
MSL rating:
Good for Gifts
|
MSL Pointer Review:
A thought-provoking read on globalization and the future of our world. |
If you want us to help you with the right titles you're looking for, or to make reading recommendations based on your needs, please contact our consultants. |
 Detail |
 Author |
 Description |
 Excerpt |
 Reviews |
|
|
Author: Thomas L. Friedman
Publisher: Audio Renaissance; Unabridged edition
Pub. in: April, 2006
ISBN: 1427200157
Pages:
Measurements: 5.8 x 5.3 x 2.7 inches
Origin of product: USA
Order code: BB00082
Other information:
|
Rate this product:
|
- Awards & Credential -
The World Is Flat was given the first Financial Times and Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award, a bestseller on Amazon.com Bestseller ranking #21 in books as of December 12, 2006. |
- MSL Picks -
A few months before coming to Friedman's The World Is Flat, I watched "Lou Dobbs Tonight" on the CNN television network. Over the course of many broadcasts, Dobbs wove the theme of outsourcing into his nightly presentation, noting the loss of American jobs as various commercial processes moved from the U.S. to other countries. The provision of telephone technical support by companies in India for American-sold computer products is a widely publicized example. Friedman's book provides a counterpoint to Lou Dobbs' reports, not that Friedman denies the existence of outsourcing, but that he recognizes how the practice can empower and improve not only the providers of outsourced services but also the domestic companies that engage in it. He points out that improved companies can then expand and employ additional domestic workers in new and different positions.
Outsourcing practices are, of course, but one aspect of what Friedman describes as a "flat world" in which modern communications technology continues to remove national barriers, both physical and economic. His book does not argue the pros and cons of this global economic interaction but points out that it is here, that it is going to stay, and that it is inevitably going to keep expanding, whether one wishes it to or not. The old "top down" way of doing business, where bosses told essentially powerless workers what to do, is being quickly replaced by empowered workers who can communicate horizontally with other workers throughout the entire world. Such is the power of today's technology. Companies that learn how to benefit from this capability will thrive, while those that do not will inevitably wither. Friedman notes that we cannot stop this trend, so we must learn to manage it to our benefit.
Interestingly, he notes that worldwide communication and coordination benefits equally those who use it for positive ends and those who use it for destruction. Just as a global supply chain brings together the components of your new laptop computer, it also brings together the funds and the recruits who later fly hijacked aircraft into World Trade Center towers. Friedman goes on to examine the changes in philosophy and in action that must occur if the United States is to again export hope and dreams to the rest of the world instead of fear, and it is hopes and dreams, not fear, that will deprive future Al-Qaedas of their "martyrs in waiting."
Friedman's message is an important one, and that makes his book worthy of being read. Still, he has no magic bullets to offer, and some of his observations come across as shallow and even naive. For instance, he notes that the globalization of our economy will indeed force many American workers from their current jobs because those jobs can be performed better (in terms of economics) elsewhere, so to continue to perform them in-house would be to the detriment of the American business. However, his solution, for workers to learn new skills and find new niches in the economy where they will again be the best, disregards the reality of human psychology and, in many cases, limits to individual ability.
In addition to the speciousness of some of his solutions, Friedman makes one assumption throughout the book that I find distasteful, and that is his unquestioned acceptance of profit and financial success as the ultimate goal of the "good life." He projects the image of a pure capitalist who subordinates humanitarian considerations to economic successes. For example, he cites as one example of humanitarianism an American CEO who generously matches, dollar for dollar, worker contributions to the company's employee benefit fund. Considering that CEO's income versus that of his employees, such a contribution is nothing but a pittance, yet Friedman seems to think it a generous example of philanthropy. However, to me this appears to be little more than condescension.
While the text does include many real-life examples to illustrate its points and while it does provide quite a few astounding revelations as to the world-wide supply chains that already tie together many apparently disparate economies, such as those of the U.S. and China, yet I cannot say that Friedman's prose is particularly captivating. As is most "business writing," his text lacks linguistic creativity and has not a whit of inspirational vocabulary to expand the reader's appreciation of the language.
Despite the weakness of Friedman's solutions for displaced workers, despite his capitalistic bias, and despite the rather unimaginative prose in which it is written, his book does examine the extreme and significant changes that technology has recently brought to world economies and, through them, to world cultures and to the need for social adaptation. As such, it is valuable reading for teachers, business managers, and those who persist in the false belief that tariffs and border fences have any place in the modern world.
By the way, most English speakers know what the phrase "nine-eleven," usually written 9/11, stands for, but do you know what 11/9 represents and why its lesson is even more important to the future of the world than that of 9/11? No? Then by all means, please do read Friedman's book! (From quoting William Fuller, USA)
Target readers:
Executives, managers, entrepreneurs, government and non-profit leaders, professionals, and MBAs.
|
Thomas L. Friedman has won the Pulitzer Prize three times for his work at The New York Times, where he serves as the foreign affairs columnist. He is the author of three previous books, all of them bestsellers: From Beirut to Jerusalem, winner of the National Book Award for nonfiction; The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization; and Longitudes and Attitudes: Exploring the World After September 11. In 2005 The World Is Flat was given the first Financial Times and Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award, and Friedman was named one of America’s Best Leaders by U.S. News & World Report. He lives in Bethesda, Maryland, with his family.
|
From the Publisher:
When scholars write the history of the world 20 years from now and they come to the chapter "Y2K to March 2004," what would they say was the most crucial development? The attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9/11 and the Iraq war? Or the convergence of technology and events that allowed India, China, and so many other countries to become part of the global supply chain for services and manufacturing, creating an explosion of wealth in the middle classes of the world’s 2 biggest nations and giving them a huge new stake in the success of globalization? And with this "flattening" of the globe, which requires us to run faster in order to stay in place, has the world gotten too small and too fast for the human beings and their political systems to adjust in a stable manner?
In his brilliant new book, the award-winning New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman demystifies this brave new world for readers, allowing them to make sense of the often bewildering global scene unfolding before their eyes. With his inimitable ability to translate complex foreign policy and economic issues, Friedman explains how the flattening of the world happened at the dawn of the 21st century; what it means to countries, companies, communities, and individuals; and how governments and societies can, and must, adapt. The World Is Flat is a timely and essential update on globalization, its successes and discontents, powerfully illuminated by one of our most respected journalists.
|
In the winter of 2004 I had tea with Richard C. Koo, chief economist for the Nomura Research Institute. I tested out on Richard my "coefficient of flatness": the notion that the flatter one's country is – that is, the fewer resources it has – the better off it will be in a flat world. The ideal country in a flat is the one with no natural resources, because countries with no natural resources tend to dig inside themselves. They try to tap the energy, entrepreneurship, creativity, and intelligence of their people – men and women – rather than drill an oil well. Taiwan is a barren rock in a typhoon-laden sea, with virtually no natural resources – nothing but the energy, ambition, and talent of its own people – and today it has the third-largest financial reserves in the world. The success of Hong Kong, Japan , South Korea, and coastal China can all be traced to a similar flatness.
"I'm a Taiwanese-American with a father from Taiwan and with a Japanese mother," Koo told me. "I was born in Japan and went to Japanese elementary school and then moved to the States. There is a saying in China that whatever you put in your head and your stomach, no one can take away from you. In this whole region, that is the DNA. You just have to study hard and move forward. I was told relatively early by my teachers, "We can never live like Americans and Canadians. We have no resources. We have to study hard, work hard, and export hard."
A few weeks later I had breakfast in Washington with P. V. Kannan, CEO of 24/7 Customer. When it comes to the flat world, said P.V., he had just one question: "Is American prepared? It is not...You've gotten a little contented and slow, and the people who came into the field with (the triple convergence) are really hungry. Immigrants are always hungry – and they don't have a backup plan."
A short time later I read a column by Stephen Pearlstein, The Washington Post's business columnist/reporter, under the headline "Europe's Capitalism Curtain." From Wroclaw, Poland (July 23, 2004), Pearlstein wrote: "A curtain has descended across Europe. On one side are hope, optimism, freedom and prospects for a better life. On the other side, fear, pessimism, suffocating government regulations and a sense that the best times are in the past." This new curtain, Pearlstein argued, demarks Eastern Europe, which is embracing capitalism, and Western Europe, which is wishing desperately that it would go away.
"This time, however, it is the East that is likely to prevail," he continued. "The energy and sense of possibility are almost palpable here…Money and companies are pouring in – not just the prestige nameplates like Bombardier, Siemens, Whirlpool, Toyota and Volvo, but also the network of suppliers that inevitably follows them. At first, most of the new jobs were of the semi-skilled variety. Now they have been followed by design and engineering work that aims to tap into the largest concentration of university students in Eastern Europe…The secret isn't just lower wages. It's also the attitude of workers who take pride and are willing to do what is necessary to succeed, even if it means outsourcing parts production or working on weekends or altering vacation schedules – things that would almost certainly trigger months of acrimony and negotiation in Western Europe…"
I heard a similar refrain in a discussion with consular officials who oversee the granting of visas at the U.S. embassy in Beijing. As one of them put it to me, "I do think Americans are oblivious to the huge changes. Every American who comes over to visit me (in China) is just blown away…Your average kid in the U.S. is growing up in a wealthy country with many opportunities, and many are the kids of advantaged educated people and have a sense of entitlement. Well, the hard reality for that kid is that 15 years from now Wu is going to be his boss and Zhou is going to be the doctor in town. The competition is coming, and many of the kids are going to move into their 20s clueless about these rising forces."
When I asked Bill Gates about the supposed American education advantage – and education that stresses creativity, not rote learning (死记硬背学法 – MSL remarks) – he was utterly dismissive. In his view, those who think that the more rote learning systems of China and Japan can't turn out innovators who can compete with Americans are sadly mistaken. Said Gates, "I have never met the guy who doesn't know how to multiply who created software…Who has the most creative video games in the world? Japan! I never met these 'rote people'…Some of my best software developers are Japanese. You need to understand things in order to invent beyond them."
One cannot stress enough: Young Chinese, Indians, and Poles are not racing us to the bottom. They are racing us to the top. They do not want to work for us; they don't even want to be us. They want to dominate us – in the sense that they want to be creating the companies of the future all over the world will admire and clamor to work for. They are in no way content with where they have come so far. I was talking to a Chinese-American who works for Microsoft and has accompanied Bill Gates on visits to China. He said Bill Gates is recognized everywhere he goes in China. Young people there hang from the rafters and scalp tickets just to hear him speak. Same with Jerry Yang, the founder of Yahoo!
In China today, Bill Gates is Britney Spears. In America today, Britney Spears is Britney Spears – and that is our problem.
|
|
View all 13 comments |
Joseph E. Stiglitz (The New York Times) (MSL quote), USA
<2007-01-19 00:00>
(An) exciting and very readable account of globalization…One mark of a great book is that it makes you see things in a new way, and Mr. Friedman certainly succeeds in that goal…In his provocative account, (he) suggests what this brave new world mean to all of us. |
Warren Bass (The Washington Post Book World) (MSL quote), USA
<2007-01-19 00:00>
Captivating (and) engrossing…This book showcases Friedman's gift for lucid dissections of abstruse economic phenomena (and) his genius for trend-spotting…An enthralling read…Friedman embraces much of his flat world's complexity, and his reporting brings to vibrant life some beguiling characters and trends…Lively, provocative and sophisticated…We've no real idea how the 21st century will unfold, but this terrifically stimulating book will certainly inspire readers to start thinking it all through. |
A. C. Grayling (The Independent) (MSL quote), USA
<2007-01-19 00:00>
As the world's best newspaper columnist, (Friedman) has in bucket-loads the quintessential journalistic knack of finding telling ways of bringing facts and their implications into sharp focus…He brings home the speed, closeness, complexity and deep mutual engagement of the world economy by relating in detail a plethora of truly amazing facts about how it works…Friedman's book is an essential read for anyone interested to know where the next lightning-fast passage of travel over the surface of our ever-more-flattened earth is going to take us. |
C. Hunter (MSL quote), USA
<2007-01-19 00:00>
The first half of this book is dedicatd to explaining the ten major causes of the flattening of the world. This part is pretty dense and will bore most. I personally spent a long time on this first half and was tempted to give up on the whole thing. Luckily I didn't.
If you can get through the first half, you'll be rewarded with very interesting and insightful interpretations of what the flattening process will mean for the world. Friedman is an optimist, and makes a good case for the benefits that increased global competition and cooperation will bring. While I think he considers himself a progressive (and doesn't shy away from a bit of Bush-bashing), he is a free-market capitalist at heart. His conclusions stress the need for deregulation of businesses, personal responsibility, and free trade between nations.
Especially appealing to me is Friedman's assertions (which have proven true time and again) about encouraging people and countries to help themselves. Economic incentive is the strongest driving force for the betterment of individual's lives and world peace. Countries involved in world supply chains will be much less likely to incite disruptions and their people will be enriched (best example = China). Countries and people that have enough to survive (through oil revenues or welfare checks) are less likely to join the economy and improve their lots.
There is too much interesting information in this book for me to rehash much, so I'll just say that some very interesting and logical assertions are made here that will help you know what to expect in the future. I'd reccomend this book to anyone interested in world economies and relations, and who can get through a [at times] fairly dense book. |
View all 13 comments |
|
|
|
|